<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Of Recordings &#187; Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ofrecordings.com/category/rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ofrecordings.com</link>
	<description>An unhealthy obsession with square waves.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The new Beatport UI is fantastic.</title>
		<link>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2011/06/07/the-new-beatport-ui-is-fantastic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2011/06/07/the-new-beatport-ui-is-fantastic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beatport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofrecordings.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many years ago I wrote up a little rant on the awful Beatport user interface, so it&#8217;s only fair that I praise their new look. It&#8217;s fantastic: They fixed nearly every problem with the original. It&#8217;s made in HTML5 instead of Flash. Text is far more readable. Forward/back buttons and bookmarks work. It uses your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago I wrote up <a href="http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/04/dear-beatport-please-be-slightly-less-terrible/">a little rant</a> on the awful Beatport user interface, so it&#8217;s only fair that I praise their new look. It&#8217;s fantastic:</p>
<div id="attachment_286" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 695px"><a href="http://www.ofrecordings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/new_beatport.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-286 " title="new Beatport" src="http://www.ofrecordings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/new_beatport.png" alt="new Beatport" width="685" height="367" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The new Beatport design is fabulous.</p></div>
<p>They fixed nearly every problem with the original. It&#8217;s made in HTML5 instead of Flash. Text is far more readable. Forward/back buttons and bookmarks work. It uses your browser&#8217;s scrolling instead of the proprietary Flash widget scrolling. And although it&#8217;s labeled &#8220;beta,&#8221; it&#8217;s far less buggy than the official Flash-based interface.</p>
<p>I should also mention that it&#8217;s beautiful: clean, modern, and stylish. Everyone involved with the redesign, you deserve a big old high-five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2011/06/07/the-new-beatport-ui-is-fantastic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In contrast to Beatport</title>
		<link>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/07/in-contrast-to-beatport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/07/in-contrast-to-beatport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beatport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[djing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofrecordings.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Beatport gets it wrong, who gets it right? Amazon! Shopping for MP3s on Amazon is exactly like shopping for books or blenders. And yes, that&#8217;s a good thing. They have spent years refining the buying process on their site&#8211; just look at the careful phrasing of the prompts that walk you through signing in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If <a title="Beatport" href="http://www.beatport.com/">Beatport</a> gets it wrong, who gets it right?  <a title="Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon!</a> Shopping for MP3s on Amazon is exactly like shopping for books or blenders.  And yes, that&#8217;s a good thing. They have spent years refining the buying process on their site&#8211; just look at the careful phrasing of the prompts that walk you through signing in and checking out.  Why throw out everything you&#8217;ve learned to sell another product?</p>
<p>When you&#8217;ve been online for a while, you develop an intuition about how web pages work.  Many of these intuitions are very subtle, and you probably won&#8217;t notice them unless you&#8217;ve studied human-computer interaction.  A well-designed site like Amazon takes advantage of these expectations to make the sales process easier.  A Flash gadget like Beatport&#8217;s breaks your expectations and forces you to learn new details.</p>
<p>Of course, Amazon is not DJ-oriented the way Beatport is.  But if Beatport (or a competitor; I&#8217;m not picky) combined those great DJ features with Amazon&#8217;s ease of use, then we would have a killer online record shop.  And a music fiend like me would be in heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/07/in-contrast-to-beatport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Beatport: Please be slightly less terrible.</title>
		<link>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/04/dear-beatport-please-be-slightly-less-terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/04/dear-beatport-please-be-slightly-less-terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableton live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beatport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[djing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakob nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polemic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ofrecordings.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a Luddite. Although I will always have a soft spot in my heart for actual vinyl, I am on board the digital bandwagon. Bring on the MP3s! (Ignore the fact that I am hopelessly inept at DJing in Live.) And I like a lot of things about Beatport: the broad selection of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a Luddite.  Although I will always have a soft spot in my heart for actual vinyl, I am on board the digital bandwagon.  Bring on the MP3s!  (Ignore the fact that I am hopelessly inept at DJing in Live.)  And I like a lot of things about <a title="Beatport" href="http://www.beatport.com">Beatport</a>: the broad selection of both big club hits and obscure niche tunes; the fast, high-bitrate downloads; the reasonable prices.</p>
<p>But their website is <em>horrible</em>.</p>
<p>Do not make a large, complicated web application in Flash!  Just don&#8217;t do it!  Yes, Beatport looks all high-tech and pretty.  It&#8217;s also horribly difficult to use.  Your browser&#8217;s back and foward buttons don&#8217;t work; if you use them, you have to start your Beatport session all over.  The Beatport back and forward are in a weird place.  Searching in the page doesn&#8217;t work.  Bookmarks don&#8217;t work.  Tabbed browsing doesn&#8217;t work.  The fonts are too small, and you can&#8217;t resize them.  And don&#8217;t forget the minor detail that the site was completely unusable in Linux for about a year.</p>
<p>The sad part is that creating an elaborate custom Flash app like this from scratch is incredibly expensive.  They could have taken an open-source, web standards compliant shopping cart application and customized it for a third of the cost.  (Beatport, please contact us first next time.  Or hey, it&#8217;s not too late for us to fix your site&#8230;)</p>
<p>Eight years ago, usability expert Jakob Nielsen wrote a great summary of why <a title="Flash: 99% Bad (Jakob Nielsen)" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20001029.html">Flash is &#8220;99% bad.&#8221;</a> Sadly, Beatport must have missed the memo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ofrecordings.com/2008/04/04/dear-beatport-please-be-slightly-less-terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

